Cogel v. Mickow
Supreme Court of Minnesota
This action was commenced in the District Court for Good-hue county. All of the defendants appeared, two of them answered separately; to certain portions of these answers the plaintiffs demurred. The court below overruled the demurrers, and from the order overruling the same, the plaintiffs appeal to this court. A sufficient statement of the case will be found in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Oowrt
Wilson, Ch. J.
The plaintiffs aver that on the 18th day of March, 1865, they 'sold to the defendant, George Michow, materials to be used, and which in fact, were used in building a house on the S. W. i of N. W. J of Section 35, T. 112, R. 15, in Goodhue county, which piece of land was then owned by, and in possession of said George Mickow; that on the 6th day of February, 1866, they made an account in writing, which was duly sworn to, of the materials furnished, and filed the same for record in the office of the Register of Deeds, as required by law, in order to secure a lien on…
2Cited by13 opinions
- In Re HaggertySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Barton v. DrakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Volker-Scowcroft Lumber Co. v. VanceUtah Supreme Court · 1907
- In re HowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Atkins v. LittleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.