Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Emart

California Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1917No. S. F. No. 7521PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Contest after probate was instituted against the will of Nancy J. Emart, deceased. The court refused to revoke the probate of the will and this appeal followed. The facts stipulated were “that one of the attesting witnesses to said will attested said will in the forenoon of the day upon which the same was executed, and that the other attesting witness to said will attested the same upon the afternoon of said day, and that the said attesting witnesses did not sign their names or attest the said will in the presence of each other.” Further, that “the two attesting witnesses signed their names…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lane v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Noyes v. GerardMontana Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Albright v. NorthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Hoysradt v. . KingmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  5. Jauncey v. ThorneNew York Court of Chancery · 1846

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Bragg's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Moore v. GloverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Estate of KrauseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Nunley v. WillcuttMontana Supreme Court · 1954
  5. In Re Woodburn's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API