Legal Opinion

Smith v. Sullivan

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 22, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-3572PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

KATZ, District Judge.

This is an action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for review of the final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services (“Secretary”) denying plaintiffs claim for disability benefits. Plaintiff, Sarah Smith, claiming disability since 1984, applied for benefits on July 18,1985. The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) denied her claim and the Appeals Council affirmed. Following plaintiff’s commencement of a civil action in this court, the case comes before me on cross-motions for summary judgment.

Because the Secretary’s decision is not supported by substantial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Podedworny v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  3. George Dobrowolsky v. Joseph A. Califano, Jr., Secretary, Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. Greene v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Jones v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moyer v. ShalalaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Fisher v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API