Legal Opinion
A1 Team USA Holdings, LLC v. Bingham McCutchen LLP
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 1, 2010No. 09-CV-1205PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REID, Associate Judge:
This is a case of first impression involving amendments to the District of Columbia Uniform Arbitration Act. Appellant, Al Team USA Holdings, LLC (“Al”), claims that the amendments “provide[] a substantial new basis for vacating arbitral awards,” and that the trial court committed reversible error by failing to recognize the “substantial expansion of [the] court’s authority to vacate arbitral awards compared to the repealed statute.” We conclude that D.C.Code § 16-4423(b), 1 one of the new statutory provisions under which “[t]he court may vacate an award made in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Carl v. Children's HospitalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- District of Columbia v. Beretta, U.S.A., Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Lopata v. CoyneDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Schwartz v. ChowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
- Fairman v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Oehme, Van Sweden & Associates, Inc. v. Maypaul Trading & Services Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Foulger-Pratt Residential Contracting, LLC v. Madrigal Condominiums, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Equitas Disability Advocates, LLC v. Daley, Debofsky and Bryant, P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- BiotechPharma, LLC v. Ludwig & Robinson, PLLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Affinity Financial Corp. v. Aarp Financial, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.