Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Whited
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided July 6, 2001No. A01A0569PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Chief Judge.
Following the grant of summary judgment to Ronald Hudson’s uninsured motorist insurance carrier, Hudson appeals, contending that the trial court erred by reducing the limits of liability under the UM policy to zero. We agree and reverse.
Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). A de novo standard of review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Northbrook Property & Casualty Insurance v. MerchantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dees v. LoganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Ferqueron v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Mabry v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- SAXON v. STARR INDEMNITY & LIABILITY COMPANY Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company v. Rockefeller.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.