Legal Opinion
Irving v. Sunset Mutual Life Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 8, 1935No. Civ. No. 8797PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROTH, J., pro tem.
On January 6, 1930, George P. Irving by his wife, Mabel A. Irving, respondent herein, made *456application for a mutual beneficial insurance certificate in the sum of $3,000, in which respondent was named as beneficiary. At that time the Irvings were and had been for approximately seven years prior thereto, residing at 1226 Hyatt Avenue, Wilmington, California. The application was taken by one Rose, admittedly a soliciting agent of appellant company, who had been calling for some time on respondent enlisting her cooperation to persuade her husband to take out a certificate of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Wheaton v. North British and Merchantile InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Mayer v. Mutual Life Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1874
- Layton v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Berliner v. Travelers' Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- County of Williamson v. Standard Accident InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- American National Insurance v. HerreraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Traders & General Insurance Company v. Martha ChampCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Traders & General Insurance v. ChampCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Hiscox Insurance Company, Inc. v. Sandra Sanford and Midway Auction Company a/k/a Gilbert and Associates, LLC (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020