Legal Opinion

Vargas v. Brinton

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1982No. 141 and 142PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

Albert P. Vargas, appellant, brought an action to partition land owned by him and R.K. Brinton and Lula P. Brinton, appellees. The lower court granted the petition and partitioned Vargas’ portion of the property, a Vs share. Exceptions were filed which were subsequently denied. This appeal followed in which Vargas claims that he owned a Vi share in the property and that the trial court improperly limited the partition to a Vs portion. The Brintons filed a cross-appeal in which they contend that no partition should have been permitted.

Vargas attacks the lower court’s…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Cochrane's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  2. Boyd EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Shoup v. ShoupSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Sheridan v. LuceySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Stanger v. EplerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wendt v. HaneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. DeLoatch v. MurphySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Allison v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Allison v. PowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Blackmon, D. v. Moore, Z.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API