Legal Opinion

Harris Bros. v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 10, 1940No. 4 Div. 161PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The question presented for decision by the certiorari is whether transient vendors or peddlers under Schedule 146, § 348, of the Revenue Code, as amended (General Acts of 1936-37, Sp.Sess., p. 277), have to pay the maximum license levied under Schedule 32, § 348, p. 451 (Revenue Act of 1935), of said Code for the privilege of selling tobacco products in rolling stores and throughout the county or counties.

The Biennial Report of the Attorney General for 1936-38, p. 526, was to the effect that “a rolling store who sells tobacco products as outlined in the inquiry is subject to…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Connrex Corporation v. Department of RevenueCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  2. Franks v. City of JasperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Franks v. City of JasperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API