Thomas v. Harman

HAMITER, Judge.

The cause of action involved in this proceeding is the same as that in the case of Minnie Ola Thomas v. S. J. Harman, 170 So. 365, which was passed on by this court on October 30, 1936. In the former case, plaintiff alleged that she was injured'by reason of the collapsing of the faulty back steps of a house which she was renting from the owner, S. J. Harman, and she sought damages from him in the amount of $2,940. Our decision therein turned upon the question of fact of whether or not plaintiff was lawfully on the premises when the alleged injury occurred. We answered that in…