Legal Opinion
In re Daniels
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 7, 1989No. Nos. 88 C 9058, 87 B 3899PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MORAN, District Judge.
We review herein Judge Schmetterer’s amended memorandum opinion and order denying the debtor’s motion to receive the post-judgment rate of interest on the judgment of foreclosure. Robert L. Daniels, Jr. (“debtor”) urged approval of his Chapter 13 Plan (“Plan”), which provided for payment to Fleet Mortgage Corporation (“Fleet” or “creditor”) of the foreclosure judgment, with interest to accrue at the rate of 9 per cent — the Illinois statutory post-judgment rate of interest. 91 B.R. 51. Fleet objected to the proposed plan, contending the mortgage note…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- G.M. Brod & Company, Inc., a Florida Corporation, Cross-Appellant v. U.S. Home Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Nissho-Iwai Co., Ltd., Cross-Appellant v. Occidental Crude Sales, Inc., Cross-Appellee. Robert B. Weintraub, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- CitiMortgage, Inc. v. SharlowAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- In re LaportaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Summit Creditors' Trust v. Hawaii Forest Preservation, LLC (In Re Metropolitan Mortgage & Securities, Co.)District Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
- CitiMortgage, Inc. v. SharlowAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
- In Re FitchUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989