Hatter v. Icenbice

Morling, J. —

The property in controversy is Lots 4, 5, and 6, Lot 1 in Lot 2 in Lot 15, and Lot 14, except 220 feet off the east end, all in the southwest quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 4 — 78—13. Plaintiff also owns Lot 12 tn Lot 13 in the same subdivision. His residence on this latter lot, and though it is more than one-half acre in extent, no. part of it was levied on. The lots in controversy, however, are immediately contiguous to Lot 12, though defendants make some claim to the contrary. The 40 acres Just mentioned were subdivided in 1876 into 13 lots, varying in size from 1…