Legal Opinion
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Savage
District Court, D. Montana
Decided November 15, 2018No. CV 09-160-M-DWMPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDonald W. Molloy, District Judge
INTRODUCTION
Defendants the United States Forest Service, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, and their official representatives (collectively "the agencies") move under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(5) to dissolve the injunction against the Miller West Fisher Project ("Miller Project"). (Doc. 112.) The agencies argue that dissolving the injunction is warranted because their Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement ("Final Supplemental EIS") and new Record of Decision for the Miller Project comply with this Court's remand order instructing them to address the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County JailSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Christopher Savage, Kootenai National Forest Supervisor, Faye Krueger, Regional Forester of Region One of the U.S. Forest Service, United States Forest Service, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and United States Fish & Wildlife Service, an agency of the U.S. Department of the Interior; Kootenai Forest Stakeholder Coalition, a Montana Corporation, and Lincoln County, a political subdivision of the State of MontanaDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2025
- Idaho State Snowmobile Association v. U.S. Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021