Matter of Leahy v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, J.
Claimant-respondent has been awarded workmen’s compensation benefits for an injury sustained by her while working for defendant-appellant, the City of New York. Claimant was engaged as a telephone operator and receptionist in one of the offices of the city’s Board of Water Supply. Her work in itself was not one of the hazardous employments listed in the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 67). The Industrial Board found, however, that the Board of Water Supply of the City of New York operates waterworks, a hazardous employment (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 3, subd. 1, group 7), and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of Dose v. . Moehle Lithographic Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Matter of Stoerzer v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Claim of Hayes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Matter of Hayes v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
3Cited by2 opinions
- Matter of Gramlich v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Claim of Clyde v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949