Legal Opinion

Matter of Leahy v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 29, 1941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, J.

Claimant-respondent has been awarded workmen’s compensation benefits for an injury sustained by her while working for defendant-appellant, the City of New York. Claimant was engaged as a telephone operator and receptionist in one of the offices of the city’s Board of Water Supply. Her work in itself was not one of the hazardous employments listed in the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Cons. Laws, ch. 67). The Industrial Board found, however, that the Board of Water Supply of the City of New York operates waterworks, a hazardous employment (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 3, subd. 1, group 7), and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Dose v. . Moehle Lithographic Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Matter of Stoerzer v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. Claim of Hayes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  4. Matter of Hayes v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of Gramlich v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Claim of Clyde v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API