Legal Opinion

Fenner v. . Tucker

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 13, 1938PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

At the close of plaintiffs’ evidence the defendant in the court below made a motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The motion was allowed and in this we see no error.

The action is to recover for moneys claimed to have been paid out and advanced by plaintiffs to defendant’s intestate, as broker or agent, in the purchase of cotton for future delivery upon the New York Cotton Exchange. The defendant in her answer set up as a defense: “That said cotton so agreed to be purchased, or sold and delivered, was not actually delivered at the time of making said agreements to purchase,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Irwin v. WilliarSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Clews v. JamiesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  4. Ashley v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  5. Helsabeck v. . DoubSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Ballard v. BallardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Patterson v. Durham Hosiery MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  3. Cody v. . HoveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Bank v. . DerbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Royster v. HancockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API