Legal Opinion · Dissent

Common Cause of W.Va. v. Tomblin

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1992No. 20325Published

1DissentMiller, Chief Justice

The majority has obscured the real issue in this case, i.e., can over $11.5 million in pork barrel projects be allocated through the Budget Digest? The majority whitewashes the legal precepts in this area with this novel brush: “In deciding this case, it must be reality, not theory, that is the interpretative principle.” 786 W.Va. at 540, 413 S.E.2d at 361. The result is a great deal of unreality and a future potential for much mischief.

In a number of cases, we have adhered to the salutary principle that the enactment of legislation should be the product of the entire legislature (or a quorum…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. ChadhaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State Ex Rel. Barker v. ManchinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Dadisman v. MooreWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State Ex Rel. Brotherton v. BlankenshipWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Jones v. RockefellerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API