Legal Opinion

Dahler v. Meistrell.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1929PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for money had and received. Plaintiff in error was defendant and defendant in error was plaintiff in the trial court, and we will so refer to them here.

When this case was before us at the October, 1928, term of this court, the following opinion, written by Commissioner FRANK, was adopted as the opinion of the court:

"The petition alleges that defendant in August, 1923, received from the plaintiff the sum of $6,187.85 to and for the use of plaintiff; that in August, 1926, prior to the commencement of said action, plaintiff demanded payment thereof from defendant, but defendant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Althoff v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  2. Paquin v. MillikenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  3. Winter ex rel. Smith v. Kansas City Cable Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  4. Wm. S. Merrill Chemical Co. v. NickellsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. Kingman-Moore Implement Co. v. EllisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kesinger v. BurtrumMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Witte v. Cooke Tractor Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  3. Wrede v. Exchange Bank of GibbonNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Meisel v. MuellerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. Hartley v. WilliamsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API