Legal Opinion

The Burrows Co. v. Hollingsworth

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1953No. 32794PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Schaefer

Acting upon its interpretation of our decision in Modern Dairy Co. v. Department of Revenue, 413 Ill. 55, the Department of Revenue has sought to impose the retailers’ occupation tax upon sales of tangible personal property by suppliers to persons who retransfer such property in the course of “service occupations.” In this case and the companion consolidated cases, Material Service Corp. v. Hollingsworth, No. 32795, and Chicago Fire Brick Co. v. Hollingsworth, No. 32796, the position taken by the Department is challenged.

The plaintiffs in this case are pharmaceutical companies and other…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Blair v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Benson v. IsaacsIllinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Woman's Athletic Club v. HulmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  3. American Airlines, Inc. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Granite City Steel Co. v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Mobil Oil Corp. v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API