State v. Ready

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

The appellant asks the court to reexamine all the points of error originally assigned by him, but it is not deemed necessary to reexamine or notice any except the single one that a juror who returned the verdict had, within a year before that time, served as a juror in the same court.

It is now insisted that the objection made after verdict was not too late, and that the case of The State v. Jackson, 27 Kas. 581, is not controlling. The record shows that Cope had within a year served as a juror in another case; and it further *701appears that…