Legal Opinion

Anderson Petro-Equipment, Inc. v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided July 16, 2010No. 03-08-00467-CVPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIANE M. HENSON, Justice.

The State of Texas brought an action in district court to enforce three final orders issued by the Railroad Commission assessing administrative penalties against Anderson Petro-Equipment, Inc. (Anderson Petro) for failure to plug inactive wells in violation of the Texas Natural Resources Code. See Tex. Nat. Res.Code Ann. § 81.0534 (West 2001). The State sued Anderson Petro and its president, Curtis Ray Anderson, (collectively, appellants) to enforce the orders and to recover additional penalties, attorneys’ fees, and clean-up costs. See id. §§ 85.381, .383,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. General Services Commission v. Little-Tex Insulation Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hunter v. Fort Worth Capital Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Jonnet v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Arch Petroleum, Inc. v. Sharp, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  5. Serna v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Aguilar, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2011
  2. Treeline 1 OCR, LLC v. Nassau County Industrial Development AgencyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. Anderson Petro-Equipment, Inc. and Curtis Ray Anderson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2013
  4. Cleartrac, LLC v. Lanrick Contractors, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024
  5. Founders Insurance Company v. Billy's Bar & Grill LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API