Legal Opinion

United States v. Capoto

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 19, 2016No. Case No. 1:15-cr-00175 (CRC)Published

1Opinion of the Court

*68MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHRISTOPHER R. COOPER, United States District Judge

Federal law prohibits individuals from entering the White House grounds and other restricted areas without the lawful authority to do so. The Government charged Joseph Caputo with violating a provision of this law, 18 U.S.C. § 1752(a)(1), after he hurdled one of the White House’s perimeter fences and triggered a lockdown of the entire White House complex. Caputo seeks dismissal of the sole charge against him. He claims that his escapade constituted symbolic speech because he scaled the White House fence to highlight flaws in…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API