Legal Opinion

Boyce's heirs v. Dudley

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided July 19, 1848PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error, to the Fayette Circuit. Kjectment. Case 127.

1Opinion of the Court

'C hiep’JustiO'E Marshall

delivered the opinion of ihe Court.

The sole question in this case, arises upon the second section of the limitation act of 1814, (Stat.Law, 1145.)

The limitation act of ¡1796, (Stat. Law, 1127,) had enacted that a -right of entry upon land should be barred, «unless entry were made within twenty years next after such right 'or title accrued, áre., provided that if the per-son entitled, &c., were an infant, feme covert, &c., or •not within the Commonwealth at the time such right ■accrued or coming to them, every such person, and his or her heirs, may, notwithstanding the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Masterson's Heirs v. Marshall's HeirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1837

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Berry v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1866

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API