Gloeckler v. Imrie
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
The defendant obtained a judgment against the plaintiff in an action of assumpsit. This appeal followed the refusal of the court below to grant a new trial or enter judgment n. o. v.
The action grew out of a contract entered into between the plaintiff and defendant, who was to do certain work in and about a house to be erected for the plaintiff. Suit was brought by plaintiff, alleging that the defendant failed to comply with his oral contract, in that the work was not done in a careful and workmanlike manner, as a result of which plaintiff sustained damages to the extent…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- West Republic Mining Co. v. Jones & LaughlinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
- McCornack v. SharplesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Niland v. GillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- Wainwright v. Marine National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
3Cited by11 opinions
- E. C. Ernst, Inc., in No. 79-2290 v. Koppers Company, Inc., in Nos. 79-2184, 79-2320Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- J. Purdy Cope Hotels Co. v. Fidelity-Phenix Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Canuso v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Nagle Engine & Boiler Works v. ErieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Miller v. ReadingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.