Legal Opinion

Noble v. Dieckbrader

Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Hamilton County

Decided February 25, 1938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By SCHNEIDER, J.

A motion for new trial filed herein is predicated upon a number of grounds, all of which are dismissed from consideration except the one directed to the claim of' error by reason of the court’s refusal to charge the jury on the issue of contributory negligence.

The plaintiff was a child five and one-half years of age, at the time the injuries were sustained, which are the basis of the action. Defendant was operating a motor truck in a southeasterly direction on Mar-burg Avenue in Cincinnati, at about noon, at a point where Marburg Avenue is intersected by Cardiff Avenue.…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cantonzarite v. OhlanOhio Court of Appeals · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API