People v. Johnson
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. There is record support for the conclusion that the nearly 4V2 year delay between the crime and the indictment “did not deprive defendant of his due process right to prompt prosecution” (People v Velez, 22 NY3d 970, 972 [2013]). This is not a circumstance where “a lengthy and unjustifiable delay in commencing the prosecution . . . require [s] dismissal even though no actual prejudice to the defendant is shown” (People v Singer, 44 NY2d 241, 253-254 [1978]).
Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Pigott, Rivera,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. VelezNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. InnabAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. WagonerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- People v. StefanovichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- People v. KetchmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. GangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.