Legal Opinion

Frank Angelilli Construction Co. v. Sullivan & Son, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph F. Gagliardi, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the defense of lack of jurisdiction pleaded in the third-party answer of Ohio Lime Company. Plaintiff Frank Angelilli Construction Company, Inc., purchased 50 bags of lime for $55 from the defendant Sullivan & Son, Inc., in Yonkers, New York, and used it to erect plaster walls in a building also in Yonkers. It is alleged that the lime was defective so that the plaster walls proved “ long-drying,” and “ soft,” showed “ hot spots ” and were not amenable to wallpaper or paint. Plaintiff seeks $6,041.20 damages against Sullivan & Son, Inc.

Sullivan & Son, Inc., has in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. MacPherson v. . Buick Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Erl Anger Mills, Inc. v. Cohoes Fibre Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
  4. Hellriegel Ex Rel. Hellriegel v. Sears Roebuck & Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1957
  5. Muraco v. FerentinoNew York Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Khalaf v. Bankers & Shippers InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Naples v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  3. Frank Angelilli Construction Co. v. Sullivan & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  4. Khalaf v. Bankers & Shippers InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API