Legal Opinion
In re Tariffville Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 19, 1965No. Bankruptcy No. H-4593PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BLUMENFELD, District Judge.
The question raised by this petition for review is whether the attorney for the debtor-in-possession was entitled to compensation from the estate for services rendered in preparing a proposed plan of arrangement under Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C. §§ 701-799, which fell through and precipitated adjudication because the debtor-in-possession was unable to advance the fund for the requisite deposit. The Referee in Bankruptcy denied the petition for such an allowance. His order is affirmed and the petition for review is denied.
These proceedings originated…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Young v. Higbee Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guerin v. Weil, Gotshal & MangesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Lane v. Haytian Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
- In Re Dole CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1965
- Berry v. RootCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In the Matter of Casco Fashions, Inc., Bankrupt. New York Credit Men's Adjustment Bureau, Inc., Trustee v. Ballon, Stoll & ItzlerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Robinson, Wolas & Hagen v. George GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970