Legal Opinion
Mudlo v. United States
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 23, 1976No. Civ. A. 76-1009PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SNYDER, District Judge.
Mitchell Mudlo and his wife, Anna Mae, brought a damage action against the United States of America under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346 and § 2671 et seq., for serious injuries suffered by the husband when struck by a moving overhead electrical crane on the premises of the Deitch Company, his employer. The Government has moved for summary judgment and the Motion must be granted.
Plaintiffs’ original Complaint was dismissed without prejudice as being prematurely filed since Plaintiffs’ claims in the form of their counsel’s letter had not been denied…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Honda v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Stanley Bialowas, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Michael Alan Avril and Gloria Melanie McMullen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Zeller v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1979
- Founding Church of Scientology v. Director, Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
- Ryan v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1978
- Patrick v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1986
- Torres v. TaylorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.