Legal Opinion

Balke v. Swift

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 15, 1873PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Jackson Circuit Court. The bill of sale, not being followed by possession or recorded, was absolutely void as to creditors and subsequent purchasers. (W. S., 281, § 10.) The certificate of the recorder says the acknowledgment was on the mortgage when it was filed for record, to wit: Aug. 23rd. The date, then, of the acknowledgment is clearly a clerical error.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, Judge

Action for the recovery of specific personal property ; petition in usual form.

The defendant, Swift, in his answer, set up a claim to the property in controversy, a billiard table, as the bailee thereof under one Gr. B. "Wood, whom he alleged was the owner, and denied that plaintiff was entitled to recover. The reply was a mere denial of the allegation of the answer. The cause was tried by the court, a jury having been waived, and resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff.

The evidence tended to show that Meredith B. Hedges bought the property of Julius Balke, paid a portion of the purchase…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wood v. EnselSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. Gill v. Ely-Norris Safe Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API