Legal Opinion

Roy v. Mutual Rice Co. of Louisiana

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 1932No. 1004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMouton, J.

While plaintiff was working in the rice mill of defendant company, his foot and lower part of his leg were caught on a revolving shaft and were badly mangled and crushed.

He alleges that while performing the duties for which he was employed he had climbed a ladder leading to a narrow platform to disentangle a belt that operated on a glucose machine, when his foot was caught, which resulted in the injury above stated.

Under the foregoing allegations he is claiming $10,150 damages for his injuries and sufferings under article 2315, Civil Oode, and the general damage laws of the state. He avers…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Daly v. KielSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  2. Le Blanc v. United Irrigation & Rice Milling Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
  3. Rossey v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Roy v. Mutual Rice Co. of Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
  2. Landreneau v. PerronLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API