Broadstreet v. Clark
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from O’Brien Circuit Court. The defendant railroad company was garnished as the supposed debtor of its co-defendant. Judgment was rendered against both defendants, and they appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.
Upon being garnished, the railroad company answered that it was indebted to Clark, the judgment debtor, who was one of its employes in Dakota territory, and that he was a married man, and the head of a family, and a resident of said territory when the work and labor were performed for *671whicli the indebtedness was incurred, and that the same had been earned within ninety days prior to the garnishment; that under the laws of said territory said earnings were exempt from execution. Clark, the judgment debtor, intervened in the garnishment proceeding, and in substance pleaded the same facts as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burlington & Missouri River Railroad v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
- Mooney v. U. P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- Leiber v. U. P. R. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1878
- Newell v. HaydenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859
3Cited by15 opinions
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SturmSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- State ex rel. Bruns v. ClausmeierIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Drake v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Golden Gate Candy Products Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- State v. GeorgeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.