Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Yates v. Muir

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 14, 1985No. 5-84-0258PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Welch

Defendant, Donald Muir, brings this interlocutory appeal from an order of the trial court denying his motion to quash service and process and dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We granted leave to appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (87 Ill. 2d R. 308). The two issues the trial court has identified for review are as follows:

“1. Whether or not an attorney licensed to practice in Kentucky who files or fails to file an appearance in the administrative hearing of a Federal Civil Service question in Chicago for an Illinois resident is doing business within the State of Illinois to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Nelson v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Cook Associates, Inc. v. Lexington United Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gruse v. BellineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  2. Yates v. MuirIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Land v. GreenwoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Collins v. ReynardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1990
  5. Hanumadass v. Coffield, Ungaretti & HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API