Legal Opinion

Cauthen v. Norman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 24, 1932No. 4 Div. 627PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This appeal is from a judgment of the circuit eourt denying appellant’s motion to quash an execution issued on a forfeited claim bond. The evidence is without conflict, and to state the facts briefly: M. R. Norman, on October 9, 1924, sued A. D. Cauthen on account, and on June 8, 1925, had judgment thereon for $101.90, on which execution was issued which was levied on a mule as the property of the defendant. The appellant thereupon filed a claim affidavit and bond with sureties thereon, and the mule was delivered to her. Proper return of this fact was made by the sheriff, and a trial of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Boylston v. Rankin & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1896

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ex parte Arvest BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API