Speights v. Speights
Court of Appeals of Mississippi
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCarlton, J.
¶ 21. I respectfully concur in part and dissent in part with respect to the majority’s opinion. I concur with the majority’s decision affirming the chancellor’s award of physical custody of the parties’ four minor children to Dana. However, since I find no abuse of discretion by the chancellor in his award of attorney’s fees to Dana, I would also affirm this decision.3 See Miss.Code Ann. § 9-1-41 (Rev.2002);4 I also respectfully submit that Shain failed to preserve for appellate review his claim that insufficient evidence or findings support the chancellor’s award of attorney’s fees by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McKee v. McKeeMississippi Supreme Court · 1982
- Cheatham v. CheathamMississippi Supreme Court · 1988
- Mauck v. Columbus Hotel Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1999
- Regency Nissan, Inc. v. JenkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
- Lindsey v. LindseyMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.