Martin v. Arkansas Power Light Company

I cannot agree with the ■ majority in the statement that: “A number of errors are assigned and argued for a. reversal of these judgments which become unimportant, for the reason that, in our ■judgment, the court should have directed a verdict for appellee on the undisputed evidence and the physical facts and circumstances connected 'with the accident.”

The majority opinion, however, says that the errors alleged are not considered because the court should have directed a verdict for the appellee on the undisputed evidence and the physical facts and circumstances connected with the accident. All…