Legal Opinion
Tosques v. Ponyicky
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 29, 2011PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1098Family Court Act § 440 (1) (a) provides that when an order of support is to be enforced by the support collection unit (hereinafter the SCU), the Family Court must establish the amount of retroactive support and notify the parties that the SCU will enforce that amount “pursuant to an execution for support enforcement as provided for in [CPLR 5241 (b)], or in such periodic payments as would have been authorized had such an execution been issued” (Family Ct Act § 440 [1] [a]). The statute further provides that in such case, “the court shall not direct the schedule of repayment of retroactive…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kennedy v. VentimigliaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Commissioner of Social Services v. Daryl S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Betancourt v. BetancourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Rohme v. BurnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Maharaj-Ellis v. LarocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by6 opinions
- Oshodi v. OlouwoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of Bustamante v. DonawaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Burris v. BurrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Lanasa v. LanasaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Matter of Cordero v. Commissioner of Social Services, Support Collection UnitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.