Legal Opinion
Rocklen's Auto Parts & Service, Inc. v. Rakiec
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 18, 1986No. 4142PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Since the defendant failed to comply with the provisions of General Statutes § 52-212 and Practice Book § 377, the trial court was correct in refusing to grant the defendant’s motion to open the judgment by default.
There is no error.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. WaterfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Bufferd v. YostConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- Dister Corp. v. Northco, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998