Legal Opinion

Taylor v. . Apple

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1884PublishedCited by 6 opinions

EJECTMENT trier¡ at Full Term, 1883, of Caswell Superior Court, before Mac Rae, J. The facts relating to the matters passe! upon by this court are stated in its opinion. The defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

This action, instituted by the plaintiffs against the defendant Solomon Apple, is for the recovery of possession and damages for the detention of the land mentioned in the complaint, upon the filing of which at the return of the summons, Agues B. Apple, his wife, on her application, was admitted a party to defend her own title, upon affidavit stating that the land had been bought and paid for out of her moneys, or moneys, furnished by her father for her benefit, though her husband had taken a conveyance of the estate to himself. Her answer was ■put in, stating this matter in defence, and the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Manning v. . ManningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  2. Cecil v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Young v. . GreenleeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  4. Jones v. . Fortune and AnotherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dempsey v. . RhodesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Jones v. . CoffeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  3. Walton v. . ParishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
  4. Burns v. Womble.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  5. Wilson v. . FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API