Fidelity Financial Services, Inc. v. Hill
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BARTEAU, Judge.
Fidelity Financial Services, Inc. ("Fideli ty") initiated proceedings supplemental to enforce a judgment it had against James Hill. Roselyn Bakery ("Roselyn") was named as a garnishee defendant in the proceedings supplemental. The final order in garnishment required Roselyn to garnish Hill's wages as of August 15, 1990. Rose-lyn did not do so and on November 7, 1990, Fidelity filed a motion for enforcement of the garnishment order. After the hearing on Fidelity's motion, the trial court entered an order making the garnishment order effective as of December 7, 1990 and denied…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Radiotelephone Co. of Indiana v. FordIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- In Re Marriage of WootenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
- Hudson v. TysonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by1 opinion
- McClure Oil Corp. v. Whiteford Truck LinesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994