Legal Opinion
United States v. Continental Casualty Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 11, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 62-435PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROSENBERG, District Judge.
This is a motion for a new trial by the defendants.
Suit was brought under the provisions of 49 Stat. 793 (1935). U.S.C. Title 40, §§ 270a, 270b, 270c and 270d, as amended, commonly known as the Miller Act.
The use-plaintiff brought this action to recover damages because the defendants failed to pay the use-plaintiff for materials supplied to David R. Murphy (Murphy), sub-contractor, for Acme Missiles & Construction Corporation (Acme) on two guided missile defense installations known as “nike” sites in the Pittsburgh area.
The case was tried non-jury, and this Court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Fleisher Engineering & Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. HallenbeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States Ex Rel. American Radiator & Sanitary Corp. v. Northwestern Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- United States ex rel. Genesee Sand & Gravel Corp. v. Fleisher Engineering & Construction Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1942
- United States ex rel. Betts v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Interform Co. v. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States Ex Rel. Taykinswell, Inc. v. Bencon Construction Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1965
- J D Fields & Co, Inc v. Gottfried CorpCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Arzuaga & Santana, Inc. v. Ramos RiveraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1971
- Arzuaga & Santana, Inc. v. Ramos RiveraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1971
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.