Legal Opinion

Competitive Enterprise Institute and Consumer Alert v. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, General Motors Corporation, Intervenor

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 19, 1992No. 89-1422PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.

Opinion dissenting in part filed by Chief Judge MIKVA.

STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:

Choice means giving something up. In deciding whether to relax the previously established “corporate average fuel economy” (“CAFE”) standard for model year 1990, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (“NHTSA”) confronted a record suggesting that refusal to do so would exact some penalty in auto safety. Rather than affirmatively choosing extra energy savings over extra safety, however, NHTSA obscured the safety problem, and thus its need to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Advocates for Highway and Auto Safety v. Federal Highway AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
  2. United States Telecom Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
  3. American Dental Ass'n v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Central Valley Chrysler-Jeep v. WitherspoonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
  5. United States Telecom Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Bell Atlantic Telephone Companies, Intervenors. United States Telecom Association v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, At&t Corporation, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API