Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Farm Credit Services of Mid-America
Indiana Supreme Court
1DissentBoehm, Justice
I agree in large part with the majority’s account of tax immunity doctrine past and present. And the majority’s result is inviting. As the majority explains, PCAs enjoy only limited immunity from state and local taxation, but FLBAs enjoy complete immunity. One can imagine that an ACA, as the product of a merger of these two, might enjoy tax immunity for those activities traditionally conducted by FLBAs, but not for those historically performed by PCAs. Nonetheless, it seems clear to me that Mid-America, as an ACA, is a new entity, albeit one formed by the merger of a PCA and an FLBA. Neither…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- United States v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Arkansas v. Farm Credit Services of Central ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Indiana Department of State Revenue v. Farm Credit Services of Mid-AmericaIndiana Supreme Court · 2000