Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Hazzard

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Pennington county; Hon. Levi McGee, Judge. Action by George F. Whitney and others against Charles D. Hazzard and others. Demurrer to the complaint was overruled, and defendant Hazzard appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCorson, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order overruling the demurrer to the complaint. The action is brought by the plaintiff George F. Whitney and some 30 other plaintiffs, claiming to be stockholders in the Blossom Gold Mining Company, a corporation, against the defendant Hazzard and the *492said mining company. The object of the action is to vacate and set aside a certain decree of foreclosure entered in the circuit court of Pennington county in favor of the said Hazzard and against said corporation. The complaint is exceedingly lengthy, extending over some 56 pages of appellant’s abstract, but the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Freeman v. WoodNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Kitzman v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Loftus v. Farmers' Shipping Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Reagan v. FitzGeraldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Scandia Mining SyndicateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Frederick Milling Co. v. Frederick Farmers' Alliance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Roberts v. . PrattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  4. Egge v. HaglundSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Seubert v. SeubertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API