Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wisconsin Hydro-Electric Co. v. Railroad Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1932Published

1DissentRosenberry, C. J.

I find myself unable to agree with the construction placed upon the statute by the court. It seems to me to confuse the statutory provisions relating to the issuance of securities with the law relating to the making of rates. Except as the two matters are drawn together by the opinion of the court, they seem to me to be distinct and unrelated. Inasmuch as the construction now placed upon the statute is conclusive, no useful purpose will be served by more discussion.

The following opinion was filed June 20, 1932 :

Fritz, J.

On the motion for a rehearing, argument was ordered. From the briefs and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCardle v. Indianapolis Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. St. Louis & O'Fallon Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Waukesha Gas & Electric Co. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  4. City of Milwaukee v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Pabst Corp. v. Railroad CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API