Legal Opinion

Monty v. Monty

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 9, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] Charles Monty appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Cumberland County, Brennan, J.) granting guardian ad litem Timothy Robbins’s motion to enforce the fees owed to him. Contrary to Monty’s contentions, the court did not exceed the bounds of its discretion in denying Monty’s motions to continue, Wright & Mills v. Bispham, 2002 ME 123, ¶ 13, 802 A.2d 430, 433 (stating that we will examine *107the denial of a motion to continue to determine whether it prejudiced a party’s substantial rights), and did not violate his due process rights, Kirkpatrick v. City of Bangor, 1999 ME 73, ¶ 15,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kirkpatrick v. City of BangorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  2. Wright & Mills v. BisphamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frederick B. Lincoln v. Harold Burbank IISupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API