Legal Opinion

Owens v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 10, 1927No. 12283PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Stabler.

This action was brought under the Federal Employer’s Inability Act (45 USCA §§ 51-59 [U. S. Comp. St. §§ 8657-8665]) by the /administratrix of the estate of M. H. Owens, for the benefit of his widow and her six children.

The complaint alleged that on the 16th day of March, 1923, while M. H. Owens, who was employed by defendant as a car inspector in its yard at Florence, South Carolina, was engaged in work of the defendant that was part of and connected with interstate commerce, he was run over and killed by one of defendant’s trains,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mann v. Seaboard Air Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Youngblood v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cato v. Atlanta & C. A. L. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  2. Cato v. Atlanta & C. Air Line Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  3. Bell v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1930
  4. Cato v. Atlanta & C. A. L. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API