Legal Opinion

Sparks v. Sparks

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEhvikt, J.

The order allowing plaintiff to amend bis complaint was authorized by G.S. 1-163 conferring upon courts the discretionary power to permit amendment of pleadings at any stage of a trial, even after final judgment, unless the amendment effects a substantial change in the claim or defense.

Manifestly, the complaint as amended states but one cause of action, i.e., a cause of action to quiet title to the locus in quo and to remove an adverse claim as a cloud thereon. G.S. 41-10; McIntosh: North Carolina Practice and Procedure in Civil Cases, sections 986-987; 51 C.J., Quieting Title, sections…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Shore v. . HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  2. McKeel v. . HollomanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  3. Colgrove v. . KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  4. Wyone Shoe Co. v. Daniels & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1911
  5. Swindell v. . SmawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Teague v. Siler City Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API