Legal Opinion

Henry Glass & Co. v. Misroch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 14, 1924Published

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, J.:

The action is brought by the seller for the purpose of recovering the purchase price of goods which were delivered to the defendant by the seller, consisting of 5,914J yards of dress goods. The plaintiff, the seller, claims that title to the goods has passed to the vendee, and, therefore, that it is entitled to recover the purchase price. It was so held by the court, provided the goods were of the quality contracted for. That question was left to the jury, which decided in favor of the plaintiff.

A new trial of this case would be required because of the admission in evidence of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Larkin v. . GeisenheimerNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Larkin v. GeisenheimerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API