Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 3, 1912No. A-1296PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Garvin County Court; W. B. M. Mitchell, Judge. . T. E. Smith was convicted of violating the prohibitory law, and brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtEurman, P. J.

In this case, the information charged appellant with having sold whisky, beer, wine, and ale. The testimony was that defendant sold a patent medicine, known as “American Elixir.” It is a fundamental principle of justice and law that a defendant cannot be charged with one offense and convicted of another. There was therefore a fatal variance between the allegations in the information and the testimony in this case. -If the information had charged that appellant had sold a patent medicine, known as “American Elixir,” and that the same was intoxicating, or that it was used as a substitute for…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kolar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API