Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Baratta

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided February 23, 1951PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Henderson, S.

The decedent’s widow has asserted a claim against the estate for certain payments accruing subsequent to decedent’s death, pursuant to the terms of a separation agreement which did not expressly specify that they were to continue during her life.

The decedent and the claimant were married in 1923. They separated in 1932 and while living apart entered into a separation agreement on May 18, 1933, by the terms of which the decedent agreed to pay his wife the sum of $15 per week. No provision is expressed as to the duration of the payments.

Upon the decedent’s death, the widow applied…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. . HinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  2. In re the Estate of TierneyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  3. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of JungeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1925
  4. In re the Estate of StablefordNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. EverySupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Cohen v. CroninNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. In re the Estate of PorterNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954
  4. Cooke v. CookeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
  5. In re the Estate of HoweNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API