Legal Opinion

Gardner v. State of Miss.

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1959No. 40992PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillespie, J.

Appellants, being the heirs at law of D. A. Wilkinson, deceased, and those claiming under them, filed their bill to confirm title to the surface rights and a one-fourth undivided interest in and to the oil, gas and other minerals to 160 acres of land in Smith County. The defendants filed a cross-hill seeking to have the title to their respective interests in said lands, not necessary to here state, confirmed and to cancel all claims of the appellants as clouds ou their title. The chancellor dismissed the original bill, adjudged that the appellants had no interest in the lands or minerals and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Laurel Auto Supply Co. v. SumrallMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Lynchburg Shoe Co. v. CastlemanMississippi Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Stringfellow v. StringfellowMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Martin v. WinfieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  3. IRBY ET UX. v. Citizens Natl. Bk.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Berkline Corp. v. Bank of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Irby v. Citizens National Bank of MeridianMississippi Supreme Court · 1960

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API